Systems and Asylum Procedures


After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies have become reviving these kinds of systems. Right from lie detection tools examined at the line to a system for validating documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of technologies is being utilized in asylum applications. This article is exploring just how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. It reveals just how asylum seekers are transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unforeseen tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their capacity to find their way these systems and to follow their legal right for safety.

It also illustrates how these kinds of technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They assist in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering all of them from being able to view the stations of security. It further states that studies of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms worth mentioning technologies, in which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects whom are regimented by their dependence on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal know-how, the article states that these technologies have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double result: although they help to expedite the asylum method, they also generate it difficult to get refugees to navigate these systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions of non-governmental actors, and This Site ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their instances. Moreover, they will pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.

Đây là bài viết: "Systems and Asylum Procedures" của tripleR thuộc nhóm chủ đề: .

Hãy để lại bình luận của bạn tại đây

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai.